|
Post by Lisbeth Salander on Aug 29, 2014 22:29:48 GMT 5.5
whitelily taistoHow should we approach the above question? Do we start with theory and then apply it to this specific case? Also, what should be the minimum length of the answer in terms of the no. of words? Thanks
|
|
|
Post by patriot on Sept 1, 2014 12:54:28 GMT 5.5
whitelilyIt's not only unethical but also illegal to torture someone while under police custody. It's infringment of human rights of the arrested person which no civilized nation's law warrants. I will not resort to any violent method to get the information from the alleged kingpin. However, the situation is very grave which requires urgent attention and action in order to save innocent girls from being trafficked to foreign countries. First of all, I will send the details of the kidnapped girls to all the international airports within the country and entry/exit points of the roads to the neighbouring countries to track the kidnapped girls in case they are being trafficked outside the country. I will then send the search teams to all the suspected places within the district associated with the kingpin to search the kidnapped girls. I will then get into deep investigation to collect evidences reagrding gang's kingpin previous criminal antecedents. I will arrest his associates to gather information about the kingpin and convicnce them to testify against the kingpin of the racket in lieu of lesser punishment for the crimes previously committed. Once I will gather enough evidences against him I will threaten the kingpin to face very harsh punishment in face of evidences gathered and not cooperating with the police. I can think of this much only as of now. Can anybody tell some more angles or points. Or do we have approach the problem in altogether different way?
|
|
|
Post by lalatendu on Sept 1, 2014 13:17:22 GMT 5.5
whitelilyIt's not only unethical but also illegal to torture someone while under police custody. It's infringment of human rights of the arrested person which no civilized nation's law warrants. I will not resort to any violent method to get the information from the alleged kingpin. However, the situation is very grave which requires urgent attention and action in order to save innocent girls from being trafficked to foreign countries. First of all, I will send the details of the kidnapped girls to all the international airports within the country and entry/exit points of the roads to the neighbouring countries to track the kidnapped girls in case they are being trafficked outside the country. I will then send the search teams to all the suspected places within the district associated with the kingpin to search the kidnapped girls. I will then get into deep investigation to collect evidences reagrding gang's kingpin previous criminal antecedents. I will arrest his associates to gather information about the kingpin and convicnce them to testify against the kingpin of the racket in lieu of lesser punishment for the crimes previously committed. Once I will gather enough evidences against him I will threaten the kingpin to face very harsh punishment in face of evidences gathered and not cooperating with the police. I can think of this much only as of now. Can anybody tell some more angles or points. Or do we have approach the problem in altogether different way?
|
|
|
Post by meaksj on Sept 8, 2014 21:18:50 GMT 5.5
All Pros,
Please share your experience regarding handling such questions. For now, I totally agree with Patriot's answer.
|
|
|
Post by Lisbeth Salander on Sept 12, 2014 15:33:03 GMT 5.5
Please find below a sample answer or a framework for the question, "In what way is it important to be ethical along with being professionally competent?".
We have to negotiate possible clash between ethics and administrative competence. Here, you should substantiate your stand with real-life examples. You have to ensure professional and administrative competence but not at the cost of livelihood (ethics).
For instance, the recent Niyamgiri mining issue in Orissa where the company Vedanta wants to mine the resources, however there are primitive tribes that depend on the land for their livelihood and do not want to get displaced. So there is the issue of development of industry and employment generation and increase in state revenue by way of taxation but on the other hand is the question of ethics where a minority community with hardly any voice of their own whose livelihood and culture could get completely destroyed by the mining project.
The right way then is to conduct a referendum or poll asking the affected villages whether they would like the project to go ahead in return for suitable compensation and employment? This way, ethics is not compromised for commercial gain and if the majority of the affected population gives its consent, the project can commence without leading to a feeling of victimisation by the displaced communities.
So we have to consult all stake-holders, no matter how big or small, in the administrative decision-making.
[copy-paste]
PS: Please critique this answer structure. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Agent Smith on Sept 18, 2014 23:03:44 GMT 5.5
Is this book available in hindi also..??
|
|
|
Post by Ek_Musafir on Sept 24, 2014 0:57:10 GMT 5.5
michael phelps Bhai, there is a problem in downloading from Scribd as you have to purchase their premium plans to download it. Wait I will download for you and upload here for everyone. thanks bro
|
|
|
Post by maximas on Oct 3, 2014 13:10:26 GMT 5.5
Can anybody tell me how is JTS ethics book. Looking at index it have covered the entire syllabus !
|
|
|
Post by Lisbeth Salander on Oct 21, 2014 16:19:20 GMT 5.5
Question: You are a strong religious believer since childhood and have been an active participant in your religious institution. When you grew up, you became the administrative authority in the locality where the religious institution belongs. One day your superior informs you that the mentioned religious institution is an illegal construction on a government property and needs to be demolished. You are shocked to hear this and upon verification found the information passed by your superior is true. You, like thousands visiting the place, have emotional attachment to the institution. Your personal ethics and religious values are holding you back from taking the initiative to demolish the illegal construction, but your profession demands so. Besides, you fear the destruction of such an institution may fuel communal violence. Being born in a religious family, it’s not easily digestible for you to carry the tag of ‘demolisher of one’s own religious institution’. You fear that the act will turn you against your own community. This situation pulls you into an emotional and ethical dilemma. Is the above case a conflict between personal ethics and professional ethics? What will be your response? < ethics-case-study>
|
|
|
Post by peterpan on Oct 28, 2014 21:51:11 GMT 5.5
I am going to start ethics soon too for 2015 . My primary readings are based on vision IAS recommendation :
Mohit Bhattacharya Rajni Goyal IGNOU and 2nd ARC REPORT
I am also adding to the above A set of small material from hemant jha s classes . It's easily available in ORN ...
Will try to attempt the papers once I am done with my reading and share if the efficiency of the above readings ...
|
|